Supplementary Figure 1: Serum levels of AMA-MMAE in mice. Supplementary Figure 2: Correlation plot of tumor growth inhibition versus specific tumor uptake. Supplementary Table 1: Overview results. Supplementary Table 2: Tumor growth inhibition study of mice bearing OVCAR3-X2.1 cells comparing the efficacy of 5mg/kg and 20mg/kg doses
ARTICLE ABSTRACT
Antibody–drug conjugates (ADC) use monoclonal antibodies (mAb) as vehicles to deliver potent cytotoxic drugs selectively to tumor cells expressing the target. Molecular imaging with zirconium-89 (89Zr)-labeled mAbs recapitulates similar targeting biology and might help predict the efficacy of these ADCs. An anti-mesothelin antibody (AMA, MMOT0530A) was used to make comparisons between its efficacy as an ADC and its tumor uptake as measured by 89Zr immunoPET imaging. Mesothelin-targeted tumor growth inhibition by monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE), ADC AMA-MMAE (DMOT4039A), was measured in mice bearing xenografts of ovarian cancer OVCAR-3×2.1, pancreatic cancers Capan-2, HPAC, AsPC-1, and HPAF-II, or mesothelioma MSTO-211H. Ex vivo analysis of mesothelin expression was performed using immunohistochemistry. AMA-MMAE showed the greatest growth inhibition in OVCAR-3×2.1, Capan-2, and HPAC tumors, which showed target-specific tumor uptake of 89Zr-AMA. The less responsive xenografts (AsPC-1, HPAF-II, and MSTO-211H) did not show 89Zr-AMA uptake despite confirmed mesothelin expression. ImmunoPET can demonstrate the necessary delivery, binding, and internalization of an ADC antibody in vivo and this correlates with the efficacy of mesothelin-targeted ADC in tumors vulnerable to the cytotoxic drug delivered. Mol Cancer Ther; 16(1); 134–42. ©2016 AACR.
