PDF file 64K, Supplementary Table S1. Overview of conflicting reports regarding the importance of OCT1 genetics, OCT1 expression, or cellular imatinib uptake for imatinib pharmacokinetics and response Supplementary Table S2. Multiple reaction monitoring transitions and MS parameters for determination of imatinib, N-desmethyl imatinib and their internal standards with LC-MS-MS Supplementary Table S3. Characteristics of SLC family members whose mRNA expression has been quantified by real-time PCR in the present study
ARTICLE ABSTRACT
Purpose: In addition to mutated BCR-ABL1 kinase, the organic cation transporter 1 (OCT1, encoded by SLC22A1) has been considered to contribute to imatinib resistance in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). As data are conflicting as to whether OCT1 transports imatinib and may serve as a clinical biomarker, we used a combination of different approaches including animal experiments to elucidate comprehensively the impact of OCT1 on cellular imatinib uptake.Experimental Design: Transport of imatinib was studied using OCT1-expressing Xenopus oocytes, mammalian cell lines (HEK293, MDCK, V79) stably expressing OCT1, human leukemic cells, and Oct1-knockout mice. OCT1 mRNA and protein expression were analyzed in leukemic cells from patients with imatinib-naïve CML as well as in cell lines.Results: Transport and inhibition studies showed that overexpression of functional OCT1 protein in Xenopus oocytes or mammalian cell lines did not lead to an increased cellular accumulation of imatinib. The CML cell lines (K562, Meg-01, LAMA84) and leukemic cells from patients expressed neither OCT1 mRNA nor protein as demonstrated by immunoblotting and immunofluorescence microscopy, yet they showed a considerable imatinib uptake. Oct1 deficiency in mice had no influence on plasma and hepatic imatinib concentrations.Conclusions: These data clearly demonstrate that cellular uptake of imatinib is independent of OCT1, and therefore OCT1 is apparently not a valid biomarker for imatinib resistance. Clin Cancer Res; 20(4); 985–94. ©2013 AACR.
