American Association for Cancer Research
Browse

Supplementary Table S4 from The Association of Neighborhood Characteristics and Frailty in Childhood Cancer Survivors: A Report from the St. Jude Lifetime Cohort Study

Download (25.07 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2023-08-01, 08:21 authored by Lindsay F. Schwartz, Rikeenkumar Dhaduk, Carrie R. Howell, Tara M. Brinkman, Matthew J. Ehrhardt, Angela Delaney, Deo Kumar Srivastava, Jennifer Q. Lanctot, Gregory T. Armstrong, Leslie L. Robison, Melissa M. Hudson, Kirsten K. Ness, Tara O. Henderson

Supplementary Table S4 shows the data output from nested logistic regression models A (neighborhood score as only predictor of pre-frailty/frailty), B (added chronic health conditions), C (added individual health behaviors), D (added demographics and treatment exposures), and E (added individual socioeconomic factors)

Funding

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

United States Department of Health and Human Services

Find out more...

American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities (ALSAC)

History

ARTICLE ABSTRACT

Childhood cancer survivors experience reduced physiologic reserve, or frailty, earlier and more frequently than peers. In other populations, frailty is impacted by one's neighborhood. This study's purpose was to evaluate associations between neighborhood characteristics and frailty in childhood cancer survivors. Participants in the St. Jude Lifetime Cohort Study with geocoded residential addresses were analyzed. Pre-frailty/Frailty was defined as having 1–2/≥3 of sarcopenia, muscle weakness, poor endurance, slow walking speed, and exhaustion from direct assessments. Neighborhood characteristics [e.g., access to exercise opportunities and healthy food, neighborhood socioeconomic status (nSES), and rurality/urbanicity] were determined using publicly available geospatial data. Nested multivariable logistic regression models identified associations between neighborhood characteristics and pre-frailty/frailty, adjusting for chronic health conditions, individual health behaviors and socio-demographics, and high-risk cancer treatment exposures. For our cohort (N = 3,806, 46.79% female, 81.40% white, mean age 33.63±9.91 years), compared with non-frail survivors (n = 2,573; 67.6%), pre-frail (n = 900; 23.6%) and frail survivors (n = 333; 8.7%) were more likely to live in neighborhoods with decreased exercise opportunities (frail OR: 1.62, 1.26–2.09), reduced healthy food access (pre-frail OR: 1.28, 1.08–1.51; frail OR: 1.36, 1.06–1.75), and lower nSES (pre-frail OR: 1.31, 1.12–1.52; frail OR: 1.64, 1.30–2.07). Participants had 8% increased odds (95% confidence interval, 2%–14%) of being pre-frail/frail if they lived in “resource poor” neighborhoods as opposed to “resource rich” neighborhoods after adjusting for other pre-frailty/frailty risk factors. The neighborhood a childhood cancer survivor resides in as an adult is associated with pre-frailty/frailty. This study provides valuable information for creating interventions using neighborhood-level factors to mitigate frailty and improve health outcomes in survivors.See related commentary by Bhandari and Armenian, p. 997

Usage metrics

    Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention

    Categories

    Keywords

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC