American Association for Cancer Research
Browse
- No file added yet -

Supplementary Methods, Supplementary Table 1, Supplementary Figure Legends from Liquid Biopsies Using Plasma Exosomal Nucleic Acids and Plasma Cell-Free DNA Compared with Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Advanced Cancers

Download (18.92 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2023-03-31, 19:25 authored by Lino Möhrmann, Helen J. Huang, David S. Hong, Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, Siqing Fu, Sarina A. Piha-Paul, Vivek Subbiah, Daniel D. Karp, Aung Naing, Anne Krug, Daniel Enderle, Tina Priewasser, Mikkel Noerholm, Erez Eitan, Christine Coticchia, Georg Stoll, Lisa-Marie Jordan, Cathy Eng, E. Scott Kopetz, Johan Skog, Funda Meric-Bernstam, Filip Janku

Supplementary Table 1. Sensitivity and specificity for BRAF, KRAS, and EGFR mutations testing of plasma exosomal nucleic acids and cell-free DNA (exoNA) using the next-generation sequencing and plasma cell-free DNA using droplet digital PCR or BEAMing digital PCR.

Funding

Sidney Kimmel Foundation for Cancer Research

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences

MD Anderson Cancer Center

History

ARTICLE ABSTRACT

Purpose: Blood-based liquid biopsies offer easy access to genomic material for molecular diagnostics in cancer. Commonly used cell-free DNA (cfDNA) originates from dying cells. Exosomal nucleic acids (exoNAs) originate from living cells, which can better reflect underlying cancer biology.Experimental Design: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was used to test exoNA, and droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) and BEAMing PCR were used to test cfDNA for BRAFV600, KRASG12/G13, and EGFRexon19del/L858R mutations in 43 patients with progressing advanced cancers. Results were compared with clinical testing of archival tumor tissue and clinical outcomes.Results: Forty-one patients had BRAF, KRAS, or EGFR mutations in tumor tissue. These mutations were detected by NGS in 95% of plasma exoNA samples, by ddPCR in 92% of cfDNA samples, and by BEAMing in 97% cfDNA samples. NGS of exoNA did not detect any mutations not present in tumor, whereas ddPCR and BEAMing detected one and two such mutations, respectively. Compared with patients with high exoNA mutation allelic frequency (MAF), patients with low MAF had longer median survival (11.8 vs. 5.9 months; P = 0.006) and time to treatment failure (7.4 vs. 2.3 months; P = 0.009). A low amount of exoNA was associated with partial response and stable disease ≥6 months (P = 0.006).Conclusions: NGS of plasma exoNA for common BRAF, KRAS, and EGFR mutations has high sensitivity compared with clinical testing of archival tumor and testing of plasma cfDNA. Low exoNA MAF is an independent prognostic factor for longer survival. Clin Cancer Res; 24(1); 181–8. ©2017 AACR.

Usage metrics

    Clinical Cancer Research

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC