American Association for Cancer Research
Browse
10559965epi121455-sup-fig1-4.pdf (116.91 kB)

Supplementary Figures 1 - 4 from Risk of Precancer Determined by HPV Genotype Combinations in Women with Minor Cytologic Abnormalities

Download (116.91 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2023-03-31, 13:47 authored by Julia C. Gage, Mark Schiffman, Diane Solomon, Cosette M. Wheeler, Patti E. Gravitt, Philip E. Castle, Nicolas Wentzensen

PDF file - 116K, Among women aged <30 with carcinogenic HPV infection, absolute risks of CIN2+ (left panel) and CIN3+ (right panel) at enrollment given category of HPV genotyping results by referral cytology.

History

ARTICLE ABSTRACT

Background: Studies suggest that testing for individual human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes can improve risk stratification in women with minor cytologic abnormalities. We evaluated genotyping for HPV16, HPV16/18, and HPV16/18/45 in carcinogenic HPV-positive women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) cytology.Methods: For women enrolled in the ASCUS–LSIL Triage Study (ALTS), we calculated the age-stratified (<30 and 30+ years) positivity and cumulative risk over two years of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse (CIN3+) when testing positive or negative for three genotype combinations: HPV16, HPV16/18, and HPV16/18/45.Results: Among women with ASCUS cytology, HPV16 positivity was 17.1% and increased to 22.0% (P < 0.001) for HPV16/18 and 25.6% (P < 0.001) for HPV16/18/45. Among women with LSIL cytology, HPV16 positivity was 21.1% and increased to 30.0% (P < 0.001) for HPV16/18 and 34.0% (P = 0.017) for HPV16/18/45. Regardless of cytology and age group, the greatest risk difference between test positives and test negatives was observed for HPV16 with decreasing risk stratification for HPV16/18 and HPV16/18/45. However, testing negative for any of the three combinations while being positive for another carcinogenic type still implied a two-year risk of CIN3+ of 7.8% or more.Conclusions: Although genotyping for HPV16, 18, and 45 provided additional risk stratification in carcinogenic HPV-positive women with minor cytologic abnormalities, the risk among genotype-negative women was still high enough to warrant immediate colposcopy referral.Impact: HPV genotyping in HPV-positive women with minor cytologic abnormalities will likely not alter clinical management. Adding HPV45 to genotyping assays is not warranted. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 22(6); 1095–101. ©2013 AACR.