American Association for Cancer Research
Browse

Supplementary Figure S1 from Automated Breast Density Assessment for Full-Field Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis

Download (23.85 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2025-01-06, 08:20 authored by Shu Jiang, Debbie L. Bennett, Simin Chen, Adetunji T. Toriola, Graham A. Colditz
<p>Supplementary Figure S1 shows distribution of density measures in external cohort</p>

Funding

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

United States Department of Health and Human Services

Find out more...

History

ARTICLE ABSTRACT

Mammographic density is a strong risk factor for breast cancer and is reported clinically as part of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) results issued by radiologists. Automated assessment of density is needed that can be used for both full-field digital mammography (FFDM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) as both types of exams are acquired in standard clinical practice. We trained a deep learning model to automate the estimation of BI-RADS density from a prospective Washington University clinic-based cohort of 9,714 women, entering into the cohort in 2013 with follow-up through October 31, 2020. The cohort included 27% non-Hispanic Black women. The trained algorithm was assessed in an external validation cohort that included 18,360 women screened at Emory from January 1, 2013, and followed up through December 31, 2020, that included 42% non-Hispanic Black women. Our model-estimated BI-RADS density demonstrated substantial agreement with the density as assessed by radiologists. In the external validation, the agreement with radiologists for category B 81% and C 77% for FFDM and B 83% and C 74% for DBT shows important distinction for separation of women with dense breast. We obtained a Cohen’s κ of 0.72 (95% confidence interval, 0.71–0.73) in FFDM and 0.71 (95% confidence interval, 0.69–0.73) in DBT. We provided a consistent and fully automated BI-RADS estimation for both FFDM and DBT using a deep learning model. The software can be easily implemented anywhere for clinical use and risk prediction.Prevention Relevance: The proposed model can reduce interobserver variability in BI-RADS density assessment, thereby providing more standard and consistent density assessment for use in decisions about supplemental screening and risk assessment.

Usage metrics

    Cancer Prevention Research

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC