American Association for Cancer Research
10780432ccr122557-sup-fig6.pdf (94.09 kB)

Supplementary Figure 6 from Sequence Dependence of MEK Inhibitor AZD6244 Combined with Gemcitabine for the Treatment of Biliary Cancer

Download (94.09 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2023-03-31, 17:00 authored by Junyao Xu, Jennifer J. Knox, Emin Ibrahimov, Eric Chen, Stefano Serra, Ming Tsao, Pinjiang Cao, Douglass Vines, David E. Green, Cristiane Metran-Nascente, Mairead G. McNamara, David W. Hedley

PDF file - 94K, Effects of treatments on body weight and white blood cell counts



Purpose: MEK inhibition has clinical activity against biliary cancers and might therefore be successfully combined with gemcitabine, one of the most active chemotherapy agents for these cancers. As gemcitabine is active in S-phase, and the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) pathway has a major role driving cell-cycle progression, concurrent use of a MEK inhibitor could potentially antagonize the effect of gemcitabine. We therefore tested the sequence dependence of the combination of gemcitabine and the MEK inhibitor AZD6244 using a series of biliary cancer models.Experimental Design: Primary xenografts were established from patients with gallbladder and distal bile duct cancer and grown in severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) mice at the subcutaneous site. Plasma and tumor drug levels and the time course for recovery of ERK signaling and S-phase were measured in tumor-bearing mice treated for 48 hours with AZD6244 and then monitored for 48 hours off treatment. On the basis of these results, two different treatment schedules combining AZD6244 with gemcitabine were tested in four different biliary cancer models.Results: DNA synthesis was suppressed during treatment with AZD6244, and reentry into S-phase was delayed by approximately 48 hours after treatment. Strong schedule dependence was seen in all four biliary cancer models tested, suggesting that combined treatment with AZD6244 plus gemcitabine would be more active in patients with biliary cancer when gemcitabine is given following a 48-hour interruption in AZD6244 dosing, rather than concurrently.Conclusions: The combination of AZD6244 plus gemcitabine is highly schedule dependent, and predicted to be more effective in the clinic using sequential rather than simultaneous dosing protocols. Clin Cancer Res; 19(1); 118–27. ©2012 AACR.

Usage metrics

    Clinical Cancer Research



    Ref. manager