Supplementary Figure 1 from Small Ubiquitin-Related Modifier Pathway Is a Major Determinant of Doxorubicin Cytotoxicity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
ARTICLE ABSTRACT
Development of drug resistance is a major challenge in cancer chemotherapy using doxorubicin. By screening the collection of Saccharomyces cerevisiae deletion strains to identify doxorubicin-resistant mutants, we have discovered that the small ubiquitin-related modifier (SUMO) pathway is a major determinant of doxorubicin cytotoxicity in yeast. Mutants lacking UBA2 (SUMO activating enzyme; E1), UBC9 (conjugating enzyme; E2), and ULP1 and ULP2 (desumoylation peptidases) are all doxorubicin resistant, as are mutants lacking MLP1, UIP3, and NUP60, which all interact with ULP1. Most informatively, mutants lacking the SUMO E3 ligase Siz1 are strongly doxorubicin resistant, whereas mutants of other SUMO ligases are either weakly resistant (siz2) or hypersensitive (mms21) to doxorubicin. These results suggest that doxorubicin cytotoxicity is regulated by Siz1-dependent sumoylation of specific proteins. Eliminating SUMO attachment to proliferating cell nuclear antigen or topoisomerase II does not affect doxorubicin cytotoxicity, whereas reducing SUMO attachment to the bud neck–associated septin proteins has a modest effect. Consistent with these results, doxorubicin resistance in the siz1Δ strain does not seem to involve an effect on DNA repair. Instead, siz1Δ cells accumulate lower intracellular levels of doxorubicin than wild-type (WT) cells, suggesting that they are defective in doxorubicin retention. Although siz1Δ cells are cross-resistant to daunorubicin, they are hypersensitive to cisplatin and show near WT sensitivity to other drugs, suggesting that the siz1Δ mutation does not cause a general multidrug resistance phenotype. Cumulatively, these results reveal that SUMO modification of proteins mediates the doxorubicin cytotoxicity in yeast, at least partially, by modification of septins and of proteins that control the intracellular drug concentration. [Cancer Res 2007;67(2):765–72]
