American Association for Cancer Research
Browse

Supplementary Figure 1 from Gene Methylation and Cytological Atypia in Random Fine-Needle Aspirates for Assessment of Breast Cancer Risk

Download (55.84 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2023-04-03, 22:04 authored by Vered Stearns, Mary Jo Fackler, Sidra Hafeez, Zoila Lopez Bujanda, Robert T. Chatterton, Lisa K. Jacobs, Nagi F. Khouri, David Ivancic, Kara Kenney, Christina Shehata, Stacie C. Jeter, Judith A. Wolfman, Carola M. Zalles, Peng Huang, Seema A. Khan, Saraswati Sukumar

Figure S1: Performance of a minimal 5-gene marker panel.

Funding

Avon Foundation

Breast Cancer Research Foundation

SKCCC Core

History

ARTICLE ABSTRACT

Methods to determine individualized breast cancer risk lack sufficient sensitivity to select women most likely to benefit from preventive strategies. Alterations in DNA methylation occur early in breast cancer. We hypothesized that cancer-specific methylation markers could enhance breast cancer risk assessment. We evaluated 380 women without a history of breast cancer. We determined their menopausal status or menstrual cycle phase, risk of developing breast cancer (Gail model), and breast density and obtained random fine-needle aspiration (rFNA) samples for assessment of cytopathology and cumulative methylation index (CMI). Eight methylated gene markers were identified through whole-genome methylation analysis and included novel and previously established breast cancer detection genes. We performed correlative and multivariate linear regression analyses to evaluate DNA methylation of a gene panel as a function of clinical factors associated with breast cancer risk. CMI and individual gene methylation were independent of age, menopausal status or menstrual phase, lifetime Gail risk score, and breast density. CMI and individual gene methylation for the eight genes increased significantly (P < 0.001) with increasing cytological atypia. The findings were verified with multivariate analyses correcting for age, log (Gail), log (percent density), rFNA cell number, and body mass index. Our results demonstrate a significant association between cytological atypia and high CMI, which does not vary with menstrual phase or menopause and is independent of Gail risk and mammographic density. Thus, CMI is an excellent candidate breast cancer risk biomarker, warranting larger prospective studies to establish its utility for cancer risk assessment. Cancer Prev Res; 9(8); 673–82. ©2016 AACR.

Usage metrics

    Cancer Prevention Research

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC