American Association for Cancer Research
Browse

Supplementary Data from Racial/Ethnic Disparities in All-Cause Mortality among Patients Diagnosed with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Download (67.99 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2023-03-31, 04:03 authored by Fei Wang, Wei Zheng, Christina E. Bailey, Ingrid A. Mayer, Jennifer A. Pietenpol, Xiao-Ou Shu

Supplementary Data. Supplementary Table 1: Characteristics of Female Patients with Triple Negative Breast Cancer by Race/ethnicity. Supplementary Table 2: HRs (95%CI) for 5-year Mortality Associated with Race/ethnicity by Stage Among Female Patients with TNBC. Supplementary Table 3: HRs (95%CI) for 5-year Mortality Associated with Race/ethnicity Among Female Patients with TNBC Stratified by Age Groups. Supplementary Table 4: HRs (95%CI) for 3-year Mortality Associated with Race/ethnicity by Types and Regions of Facility Among Female Patients with TNBC. Supplementary Figure 1: Flow chart of the study.

History

ARTICLE ABSTRACT

It is unclear whether racial/ethnic disparities in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) mortality remain after accounting for clinical characteristics, treatment, and access-to-care–related factors. In this study, women with a primary diagnosis of TNBC during 2010–2014 were identified from the National Cancer Database. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for 3- and 5-year all-cause mortality associated with race/ethnicity were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models with stepwise adjustments for age, clinical characteristics, treatment, and access-to-care–related factors. Of 78,708 patients, non-Hispanic (NH) black women had the lowest 3-year overall survival rates (79.4%), followed by NH-whites (83.1%), Hispanics (86.0%), and Asians (87.1%). After adjustment for clinical characteristics, NH-blacks had a 12% higher risk of dying 3 years post-diagnosis (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.07–1.17), whereas Hispanics and Asians had a 24% (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.70–0.83) and 17% (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.73–0.94) lower risk than their NH-white counterparts. The black–white disparity became non-significant after combined adjustment for treatment and access-to-care–related factors (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.99–1.09), whereas the white-Hispanic and white-Asian differences remained. Stratified analyses revealed that among women aged less than or equal to 50 with stage III cancer, the elevated risk among NH-blacks persisted (HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.04–1.39) after full adjustments. Similar results were seen for 5-year mortality. Overall, clinical characteristics, treatment, and access-to-care–related factors accounted for most of the white–black differences in all-cause mortality of TNBC but explained little about Hispanic- and Asian-white differences. These findings highlight the need for equal healthcare to mitigate the black–white disparity and for investigations of contributors beyond healthcare for lower mortality among Asians and Hispanics.

Usage metrics

    Cancer Research

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC