American Association for Cancer Research
Browse
10559965epi141178-sup-139547_1_supp_2742071_ncy6bn.docx (14.54 kB)

Supplemental Figure and Table Legend from Construction and Analysis of the NCI-EDRN Breast Cancer Reference Set for Circulating Markers of Disease

Download (14.54 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2023-03-31, 13:49 authored by Jeffrey R. Marks, Karen S. Anderson, Paul Engstrom, Andrew K. Godwin, Laura J. Esserman, Gary Longton, Edwin S. Iversen, Anu Mathew, Christos Patriotis, Margaret S. Pepe

Supplemental Figure and Table Legend

History

ARTICLE ABSTRACT

Background: Many circulating biomarkers have been reported for the diagnosis of breast cancer, but few, if any, have undergone rigorous credentialing using prospective cohorts and blinded evaluation.Methods: The NCI Early Detection Research Network (EDRN) has created a prospective, multicenter collection of plasma and serum samples from 832 subjects designed to evaluate circulating biomarkers for the detection and diagnosis of breast cancer. These samples are available to investigators who wish to evaluate their biomarkers using a set of blinded samples. The breast cancer reference set is composed of blood samples collected using a standard operating procedure at four U.S. medical centers from 2008 to 2010 from women undergoing either tissue diagnosis for breast cancer or routine screening mammography. The reference set contains samples from women with incident invasive cancer (n = 190), carcinoma in situ (n = 55), benign pathology with atypia (n = 63), benign disease with no atypia (n = 231), and women with no evidence of breast disease by screening mammography (BI-RADS 1 or 2, n = 276). Using a subset of plasma samples (n = 505) from the reference set, we analyzed 90 proteins by multiplexed immunoassays for their potential utility as diagnostic markers.Results: We found that none of these markers is useful for distinguishing cancer from benign controls. However, elevated CA-125 does appear to be a candidate marker for estrogen receptor–negative cancers.Conclusions: Markers that can distinguish benign breast conditions from invasive cancer have not yet been found.Impact: Availability of prospectively collected samples should improve future validation efforts. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 24(2); 435–41. ©2014 AACR.

Usage metrics

    Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC