American Association for Cancer Research
10780432ccr141069-sup-130266_1_supp_2512666_n6z60b.pdf (119.07 kB)

Data Supplement from Activating FGFR2–RAS–BRAF Mutations in Ameloblastoma

Download (119.07 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2023-03-31, 19:06 authored by Noah A. Brown, Delphine Rolland, Jonathan B. McHugh, Helmut C. Weigelin, Lili Zhao, Megan S. Lim, Kojo S.J. Elenitoba-Johnson, Bryan L. Betz

Supplemental Table S1. Ameloblastoma genotypic and clinicopathologic data.



Purpose: Ameloblastoma is an odontogenic neoplasm whose overall mutational landscape has not been well characterized. We sought to characterize pathogenic mutations in ameloblastoma and their clinical and functional significance with an emphasis on the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway.Experimental Design: A total of 84 ameloblastomas and 40 non-ameloblastoma odontogenic tumors were evaluated with a combination of BRAF V600E allele–specific PCR, VE1 immunohistochemistry, the Ion AmpliSeq Cancer Hotspot Panel, and Sanger sequencing. Efficacy of a BRAF inhibitor was evaluated in an ameloblastoma-derived cell line.Results: Somatic, activating, and mutually exclusive RAS–BRAF and FGFR2 mutations were identified in 88% of cases. Somatic mutations in SMO, CTNNB1, PIK3CA, and SMARCB1 were also identified. BRAF V600E was the most common mutation, found in 62% of ameloblastomas and in ameloblastic fibromas/fibrodentinomas but not in other odontogenic tumors. This mutation was associated with a younger age of onset, whereas BRAF wild-type cases arose more frequently in the maxilla and showed earlier recurrences. One hundred percent concordance was observed between VE1 immunohistochemistry and molecular detection of BRAF V600E mutations. Ameloblastoma cells demonstrated constitutive MAPK pathway activation in vitro. Proliferation and MAPK activation were potently inhibited by the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib.Conclusions: Our findings suggest that activating FGFR2–RAS–BRAF mutations play a critical role in the pathogenesis of most cases of ameloblastoma. Somatic mutations in SMO, CTNNB1, PIK3CA, and SMARCB1 may function as secondary mutations. BRAF V600E mutations have both diagnostic and prognostic implications. In vitro response of ameloblastoma to a BRAF inhibitor suggests a potential role for targeted therapy. Clin Cancer Res; 20(21); 5517–26. ©2014 AACR.