posted on 2023-03-30, 23:50authored byBrian D. Adams, Vikram B. Wali, Christopher J. Cheng, Sachi Inukai, Carmen J. Booth, Seema Agarwal, David L. Rimm, Balázs Győrffy, Libero Santarpia, Lajos Pusztai, W. Mark Saltzman, Frank J. Slack
<p>Figure S5, Related to Figure 6. A, Assessment of SRC mRNA levels in MDA-MB-231 SRC-ORF, EMPTY-ORF, or parental cell lines. Data is normalized in RPL19 levels. B, Crystal violet staining assays on day 5 post-transfection confirms the ability of c-SRC to rescue miR-34a-induced anti-tumor growth. C-D, Examples of Pearson correlation analysis indicating MDA-MB-231 cells were not similar to BT-549 and MDA-MB-436 cells, and therefore were not included in the initial K-Means clustering analysis (results shown in D). E, The fold knockdown by miR-34a as compared to the miR-Scr treatments of the indicated genes in Clusters 1-3 in both BT-549 and MDA-MB-436 cells using a 2-fold change cut-off. None of the genes in Cluster 4 were downregulated by miR-34a (data not shown). F, Schematic of the KEGG pathway (hsa04510: Focal Adhesion) with miR-34a downregulated genes highlighted in red. G-H, Represents further analysis of the miR-34a gene signature in breast cancer. G, Indicates correlation analyses of miR-34a target genes in TNBC patients from Metabric data. H, Confirmation of prognostic importance of mIR-34a gene signature using a PROGgeneV2 algorithm on the TCGA data set.</p>