figure
posted on 2024-02-08, 08:20 authored by Belinda Kingston, Alex Pearson, Maria Teresa Herrera-Abreu, Li-Xuan Sim, Rosalind J. Cutts, Heena Shah, Laura Moretti, Lucy S. Kilburn, Hannah Johnson, Iain R. Macpherson, Alistair Ring, Judith M. Bliss, Yingwei Hou, Weiyi Toy, John A. Katzenellenbogen, Sarat Chandarlapaty, Nicholas C. Turner Acquired mutations on fulvestrant. A, Incidence of acquired alterations (n = 69 assessable patients), colored by targetability of the alterations (Methods). Level 2B denotes the highest level of supporting evidence (“Standard care biomarker recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network or other professional advice guidelines predictive of response to an FDA-approved drug”), whereas level 4 is the lowest (“Compelling biochemical evidence supports the biomarker as being predictive of response to a drug”). B, Incidence of acquired ESR1 mutations (n = 14 patients) and resultant amino acid changes. C,ESR1 F404 locus in the DNA-binding domain of the estrogen receptor. The number of base changes identified within the data set that result in the three different missense mutations are illustrated using https://proteinpaint.stjude.org/ (36). D,cis/trans analysis of F404 and E380Q in the three patients with assessable targeted sequencing data. Both alleles of chromosome 6 are represented, with annotated locations of the F404 and E380Q on each respective allele representing the cis/trans relationship of the variants. E, Mutations at phenylalanine 404 result in the substitution of amino acid residues without an aromatic ring. F,In silico modeling predicts the aromatic ring of F404 contributes to a pi-stacking bond between the receptor and both estrogen and fulvestrant.
Funding
Cancer Research UK (CRUK)
NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust/Institute of Cancer Research (BRC)
Breast Cancer Now (BCN)
History
ARTICLE ABSTRACT
Fulvestrant is used to treat patients with hormone receptor–positive advanced breast cancer, but acquired resistance is poorly understood. PlasmaMATCH Cohort A (NCT03182634) investigated the activity of fulvestrant in patients with activating ESR1 mutations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). Baseline ESR1 mutations Y537S are associated with poor outcomes and Y537C with good outcomes. Sequencing of baseline and EOT ctDNA samples (n = 69) revealed 3/69 (4%) patients acquired novel ESR1 F404 mutations (F404L, F404I, and F404V), in cis with activating mutations. In silico modeling revealed that ESR1 F404 contributes to fulvestrant binding to estrogen receptor–alpha (ERα) through a pi-stacking bond, with mutations disrupting this bond. In vitro analysis demonstrated that single F404L, E380Q, and D538G models were less sensitive to fulvestrant, whereas compound mutations D538G + F404L and E380Q + F404L were resistant. Several oral ERα degraders were active against compound mutant models. We have identified a resistance mechanism specific to fulvestrant that can be targeted by treatments in clinical development.
Novel F404 ESR1 mutations may be acquired to cause overt resistance to fulvestrant when combined with preexisting activating ESR1 mutations. Novel combinations of mutations in the ER ligand binding domain may cause drug-specific resistance, emphasizing the potential of similar drug-specific mutations to impact the efficacy of oral ER degraders in development.This article is featured in Selected Articles from This Issue, p. 201