American Association for Cancer Research
Browse

Figure 2 from Large-scale Pan-cancer Cell Line Screening Identifies Actionable and Effective Drug Combinations

Download (5.01 MB)
figure
posted on 2024-05-01, 07:43 authored by Azadeh C. Bashi, Elizabeth A. Coker, Krishna C. Bulusu, Patricia Jaaks, Claire Crafter, Howard Lightfoot, Marta Milo, Katrina McCarten, David F. Jenkins, Dieudonne van der Meer, James T. Lynch, Syd Barthorpe, Courtney L. Andersen, Simon T. Barry, Alexandra Beck, Justin Cidado, Jacob A. Gordon, Caitlin Hall, James Hall, Iman Mali, Tatiana Mironenko, Kevin Mongeon, James Morris, Laura Richardson, Paul D. Smith, Omid Tavana, Charlotte Tolley, Frances Thomas, Brandon S. Willis, Wanjuan Yang, Mark J. O'Connor, Ultan McDermott, Susan E. Critchlow, Lisa Drew, Stephen E. Fawell, Jerome T. Mettetal, Mathew J. Garnett

Shortlisting for active and selective combinations. A, Growth inhibition (Emax) and HSA matrix plots were generated for each combination in every cell line. Combo Emax and HSA were used to identify active combinations with benefit over single agent. B, Combinations were filtered on the basis of their activity and selectivity in the tested cancer types. C, Activity of each combination tested in this screen in 41 cancer types. The fraction of cell lines where the combinations are active is indicated and combinations are grouped by category. D and E, Top 10 hits in hematologic cancers (D) and solid tumors (E). Percentage of responder cell lines for each combination in each cancer type plotted versus cancer-type specificity scores. Each color represents a cancer type and combination categories are represented by different shapes. CD, cell death; DDR, DNA damage response; CS, cell signaling; chemo, chemotherapeutic agents.

Funding

Wellcome Trust (WT)

History

ARTICLE ABSTRACT

Oncology drug combinations can improve therapeutic responses and increase treatment options for patients. The number of possible combinations is vast and responses can be context-specific. Systematic screens can identify clinically relevant, actionable combinations in defined patient subtypes. We present data for 109 anticancer drug combinations from AstraZeneca's oncology small molecule portfolio screened in 755 pan-cancer cell lines. Combinations were screened in a 7 × 7 concentration matrix, with more than 4 million measurements of sensitivity, producing an exceptionally data-rich resource. We implement a new approach using combination Emax (viability effect) and highest single agent (HSA) to assess combination benefit. We designed a clinical translatability workflow to identify combinations with clearly defined patient populations, rationale for tolerability based on tumor type and combination-specific “emergent” biomarkers, and exposures relevant to clinical doses. We describe three actionable combinations in defined cancer types, confirmed in vitro and in vivo, with a focus on hematologic cancers and apoptotic targets. We present the largest cancer drug combination screen published to date with 7 × 7 concentration response matrices for 109 combinations in more than 750 cell lines, complemented by multi-omics predictors of response and identification of “emergent” combination biomarkers. We prioritize hits to optimize clinical translatability, and experimentally validate novel combination hypotheses.This article is featured in Selected Articles from This Issue, p. 695