American Association for Cancer Research
Browse
- No file added yet -

Figure 1 from Functional Homologous Recombination Assay on FFPE Specimens of Advanced High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Predicts Clinical Outcomes

Download (929.73 kB)
figure
posted on 2023-08-15, 08:21 authored by Sanna Pikkusaari, Manuela Tumiati, Anni Virtanen, Jaana Oikkonen, Yilin Li, Fernando Perez-Villatoro, Taru Muranen, Matilda Salko, Kaisa Huhtinen, Anna Kanerva, Heidi Koskela, Johanna Tapper, Riitta Koivisto-Korander, Titta Joutsiniemi, Ulla-Maija Haltia, Heini Lassus, Sampsa Hautaniemi, Anniina Färkkilä, Johanna Hynninen, Sakari Hietanen, Olli Carpén, Liisa Kauppi

RAD51-based assay to determine fHR capacity from chemo-naïve and NACT-treated clinical HGSC specimens. A, Diagram showing the sample collection. Chemo-naïve samples were obtained from PDS or DL. NACT-treated specimens were obtained from IDS. B, Workflow of the fHR assay. Example images of geminin (green) and RAD51 (red) double stained fHRD and fHRP samples with ImageJ analysis illustration. Number of RAD51 and geminin double positive nuclei divided by the number of geminin-positive nuclei provides the fHR score. C and D, Distribution of fHR scores in chemo-naïve samples (C), as well as in the IDS (NACT-treated) samples (D), shown separately for discovery and validation cohorts. Dashed line indicates the proposed fHRD versus fHRP cutoffs. Colored squares depict HRD estimates from genomics-based assays, with blue shades corresponding to HRD and red shades to HRP. “Non-matched treatment stage” refers to cases where the genomics-based estimate of the patient was obtained from a different surgery sample (PDS/DL vs. IDS) than the fHR score. Deleterious mutations in HR genes identified from WGS/WES data are indicated for each patient. For the IDS validation cohort, only BRCA1/2 mutational testing results from the clinic were available. Asterisks indicate patients who received bevacizumab as part of their subsequent maintenance treatment. E, Comparison of fHR scores from chemo-naïve and IDS (NACT-treated) samples, obtained from the same patient (n = 13 patients). Abbreviations: ND, no data. (A, Created with BioRender.com.)

Funding

Sigrid Juséliuksen Säätiö (Sigrid Jusélius Stiftelse)

Academy of Finland (AKA)

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (H2020)

History

ARTICLE ABSTRACT

Deficiency in homologous recombination (HR) repair of DNA damage is characteristic of many high-grade serous ovarian cancers (HGSC). It is imperative to identify patients with homologous recombination–deficient (HRD) tumors as they are most likely to benefit from platinum-based chemotherapy and PARP inhibitors (PARPi). Existing methods measure historical, not necessarily current HRD and/or require high tumor cell content, which is not achievable for many patients. We set out to develop a clinically feasible assay for identifying functionally HRD tumors that can predict clinical outcomes. We quantified RAD51, a key HR protein, in immunostained formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor samples obtained from chemotherapy-naïve and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT)-treated HGSC patients. We defined cutoffs for functional HRD separately for these sample types, classified the patients accordingly as HRD or HR-proficient, and analyzed correlations with clinical outcomes. From the same specimens, genomics-based HRD estimates (HR gene mutations, genomic signatures, and genomic scars) were also determined, and compared with functional HR (fHR) status. fHR status significantly predicted several clinical outcomes, including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), when determined from chemo-naïve (PFS, P < 0.0001; OS, P < 0.0001) as well as NACT-treated (PFS, P < 0.0001; OS, P = 0.0033) tumor specimens. The fHR test also identified as HRD those PARPi-at-recurrence–treated patients with longer OS (P = 0.0188). We developed an fHR assay performed on routine FFPE specimens, obtained from either chemo-naïve or NACT-treated HGSC patients, that can significantly predict real-world platinum-based chemotherapy and PARPi response.See related commentary by Garg and Oza, p. 2957

Usage metrics

    Clinical Cancer Research

    Categories

    Keywords

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC