American Association for Cancer Research
Browse
- No file added yet -

FIGURE 1 from Validation of Immunotherapy Response Score as Predictive of Pan-solid Tumor Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Benefit

Download (824.91 kB)
figure
posted on 2023-07-25, 14:20 authored by Benjamin J. Bulen, Nickolay A. Khazanov, Daniel H. Hovelson, Laura E. Lamb, Marc Matrana, Mark E. Burkard, Eddy Shih-Hsin Yang, William J. Edenfield, Elizabeth Claire Dees, Adedayo A. Onitilo, Gary L. Buchschacher, Alan M. Miller, Benjamin M. Parsons, Timothy R. Wassenaar, Jennifer M. Suga, Robert D. Siegel, William Irvin, Suresh Nair, Jennifer N. Slim, Jamal Misleh, Jamil Khatri, Gregory A. Masters, Sachdev Thomas, Malek M. Safa, Daniel M. Anderson, Jonathan Mowers, Anna C. Dusenbery, Stephanie Drewery, Komal Plouffe, Travis Reeder, Hana Vakil, Lynnae Patrias, Amanda Falzetta, Ryan Hamilton, Kat Kwiatkowski, D. Bryan Johnson, Daniel R. Rhodes, Scott A. Tomlins

Validation of IRS to stratify anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy benefit in patients with advanced solid tumors. A, Clinical characteristics of the anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy validation cohort are shown in an alluvial diagram. All patients with available clinical molecular profiling data necessary for IRS (TMB and normalized expression of PD-1, PD-L1, ADAM12, and TOP2A from in-parallel qTP) from FFPE tumor tissue enrolled in the Strata Trial (NCT03061305) and treated with systemic anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy were considered. Patients in previous IRS discovery or validation were excluded. The locked IRS model and thresholds were used to assign IRS-L (light blue) or IRS-H (increased benefit; dark blue) status. For the 352 eligible patients, IRS status, MSI/TMB status (MSI-H or TMB-H as MSI/TMB-H), type of anti-PD-(L)1 therapy [pembrolizumab (pembro) vs. other anti-PD-(L)1], systemic line of anti-PD-(L)1 therapy, and tumor type [all tumor types with >15 samples considered individually: NSCLC, cancer of unknown primary (CUP), bladder cancer (Blad.), melanoma (Mel.), head and neck cancer (H&N), and EGC; remaining 25 other tumor types considered together] are shown. Stratum are colored by IRS status. IRS stratifies anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy clinical benefit by rwPFS (by time to next therapy; B) and OS (C). B, Anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy rwPFS stratified by IRS group is shown by unadjusted Kaplan–Meier analysis, with the aHR [adjusted for age, sex assigned at birth, line of therapy, tumor type and anti-PD-(L)1 therapy type], 95% CI and P value for IRS status (IRS-H vs. IRS-L) shown. The number (n) of patients, events, and median rwPFS (with 95% CI) for each group are shown. Forest plot analyses of rwPFS by IRS status in key subgroups are shown below (Remaining 4 = Blad., Mel., H&N, and EGC). Significant associations are shown by filled in aHR estimates. C, As in B, except assessing OS.

Funding

N/A

History

ARTICLE ABSTRACT

This study confirms the utility of the integrative IRS biomarker for predicting anti-PD-L1/PD-1 benefit. IRS significantly improved upon currently available biomarkers, including PD-L1 IHC, TMB, and MSI status. Additional utility for informing on chemotherapy, anti-PD-L1/PD-1, and anti-PD-L1/PD-1 plus chemotherapy treatments decisions is shown.

Usage metrics

    Cancer Research Communications

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC