posted on 2023-04-03, 20:46authored byEliezer M. Van Allen, Kent W. Mouw, Philip Kim, Gopa Iyer, Nikhil Wagle, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Cong Zhu, Irina Ostrovnaya, Gregory V. Kryukov, Kevin W. O'Connor, John Sfakianos, Ilana Garcia-Grossman, Jaegil Kim, Elizabeth A. Guancial, Richard Bambury, Samira Bahl, Namrata Gupta, Deborah Farlow, Angela Qu, Sabina Signoretti, Justine A. Barletta, Victor Reuter, Jesse Boehm, Michael Lawrence, Gad Getz, Philip Kantoff, Bernard H. Bochner, Toni K. Choueiri, Dean F. Bajorin, David B. Solit, Stacey Gabriel, Alan D'Andrea, Levi A. Garraway, Jonathan E. Rosenberg
Damaging scores for alterations. This table shows the damaging scores (Methods) for nonsynonymous alterations (missense, nonsense, splice site, frame shift) studied in this cohort. The damaging score was derived as follows: missense mutations were scored using the Polyphen2 score(41) for the amino acid substitution. Nonsense mutations, splice site mutations, and short insertion/deletions were automatically assigned a damaging score of 1. "Unavailable" damaging scores are those that are missense mutations without a PolyPhen2 score.